§10.1 caps the parties’ total liability under the agreement.
Illustrative. Pipeline not yet run on this filing.
The clause excludes categories of damages. It sets no monetary ceiling, and no aggregate cap appears anywhere in the agreement.
Document intelligence for law firms
Two agents read every document. One proposes findings. The other checks each one against the source and throws out what it cannot support. You see what it threw out.
§10.1 caps the parties’ total liability under the agreement.
Illustrative. Pipeline not yet run on this filing.
The clause excludes categories of damages. It sets no monetary ceiling, and no aggregate cap appears anywhere in the agreement.
Reading White Label, Co-Marketing and IP Cross-License Agreement
Agent 1 Agent 2 · verifying
THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY TO CLAIMS OR LOSSES ARISING FROM OR RELATING TO: (A) A PARTY’S BREACH OF ITS CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS UNDER SECTION 8.
Datavault AI Inc. · filed 2025-03-17
Why two agents
A verifier you cannot audit is just a second opinion.
Generic tools return answers with no trail. Ours returns the finding, the clause it came from, and the verdict that either held or did not.
Flag risks, missing clauses, and deviations from your playbook. Every finding links to the paragraph it came from.
OpenExecutive summaries, key term extraction, and obligation mapping, with each claim checked back against the source text.
OpenUpload a contract alongside your own playbook and get the deviations, clause by clause, with the playbook rule each one breaches.
OpenThe first agent reads the full document, extracts key terms, and proposes findings. Each one carries the place in the text it came from.
The second agent independently re-reads the source for every finding and marks it confirmed, weak, or rejected. It is not asked to agree.
Findings that did not survive stay visible with the reason they failed. A verifier whose failures you never see is not a verifier.
Who it is for
Great lawyers should not spend their day on work a machine can do twice.
Built for law firms, in-house legal, and compliance teams. Currently in private beta with a small number of them.
The fastest way to judge a review tool is to run it on a document whose problems you can already recite, then check what it missed and what it invented.
Early access before public launch. No pilot committee.