Document intelligence for law firms

The second agent exists to overrule the first.

Two agents read every document. One proposes findings. The other checks each one against the source and throws out what it cannot support. You see what it threw out.

EX-10.2 · §10.1See filing
Agent 1 proposed

§10.1 caps the parties’ total liability under the agreement.

Illustrative. Pipeline not yet run on this filing.

Agent 2 returnedREJECTED

The clause excludes categories of damages. It sets no monetary ceiling, and no aggregate cap appears anywhere in the agreement.

Reading White Label, Co-Marketing and IP Cross-License Agreement

Agent 1 Agent 2 · verifying

§10.1(A)CONFIRMED

THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY TO CLAIMS OR LOSSES ARISING FROM OR RELATING TO: (A) A PARTY’S BREACH OF ITS CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS UNDER SECTION 8.

Datavault AI Inc. · filed 2025-03-17

Why two agents

A verifier you cannot audit is just a second opinion.

Generic tools return answers with no trail. Ours returns the finding, the clause it came from, and the verdict that either held or did not.

One engine, three ways in.

How a finding earns its place.

01

Analyse and flag

The first agent reads the full document, extracts key terms, and proposes findings. Each one carries the place in the text it came from.

02

Verify against source

The second agent independently re-reads the source for every finding and marks it confirmed, weak, or rejected. It is not asked to agree.

03

Show the rejections

Findings that did not survive stay visible with the reason they failed. A verifier whose failures you never see is not a verifier.

Who it is for

Great lawyers should not spend their day on work a machine can do twice.

Werner Plutat, founder

Built for law firms, in-house legal, and compliance teams. Currently in private beta with a small number of them.

  • GDPR-compliant
  • No data retention
  • Source-linked output
  • Two-agent validation

Try it on a contract you already know.

The fastest way to judge a review tool is to run it on a document whose problems you can already recite, then check what it missed and what it invented.

Early access before public launch. No pilot committee.